Citation Data Is Subtle Stuff. A Primer on Evaluating a Scientist's Performance

ثبت نشده
چکیده

When starting to compile citation data from the scientific literature over 25 years ago, I aimed to create a new tool for information retrieval—the Science Citation Index (SC~. Out of this came a useful by-product: a huge and ever-increasing database containing indicators of intellectual connections among scientists and their publications. The SCZattracted the attention of historians and sociologists of science and served as a catalyst to the field of scientometrics, which uses quantitative methods to analyze the process and development of science. The 1S1 database has facilitated large-scale quantitative studies of the scientific performance of countries, institutions, fields, departments and individuals. In recent years, such scientometric studies have even contributed to public policy decisions in science. However, it is in assessing the performance of individual scientists, especially in the context of promotion or grant decisions, that the use of citation data is most controversial. This controversy has arisen for a number of reasons—none more basic perhaps than a common aversion to the impersonal judgment of numbers. Beyond that, however much of the criticism of citation measures is a response to “quickand-dirty” citation-counting, a thoughtless practice that reveals little more than an amateur at work and gives citation analysis a bad name. I have repeatedly warned about the mistaken conclusions drawn from the crude manipulation of citation data. Recently (The Scientist, February 23, 1987, p. 9), I emphasized the distinct difference between “the simple-minded counting of articles or citations as indicators of quality and the in-depth analysis that can and should be carried out.” This statement warrants some expansion. Here, then, is a primer on how to evaluate scientists using citation data. First, you’ll need a complete and accurate bibliography of the candidate’s publications. The SCl Citation Index lists all cited papers and books under the first author’s name. Using the bibliography or full CV will ensure that all coauthored publications are included in your collection of citation data. (If a bibliography or CV is unavailable, a search through successive years of the SCYSource Index, which cross-references secondary to primary authors, can provide a reasonably complete list of papers.)

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A framework for the measurement and prediction of an individual scientist's performance

Quantitative bibliometric indicators are widely used to evaluate the performance of scientists. However, traditional indicators do not much rely on the analysis of the processes intended to measure and the practical goals of the measurement. In this study, I propose a simple framework to measure and predict an individual researcher's scientific performance that attempts to take into account the...

متن کامل

Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact

We tested the underlying assumption that citation counts are reliable predictors of future success, analyzing complete citation data on the careers of ~150,000 scientists. Our results show that i) among all citation indicators, the annual citations at the time of prediction is the best predictor of future citations, ii) future citations of a scientist's published papers can be predicted accurat...

متن کامل

A New Wavelet Based Spatio-temporal Method for Magnification of Subtle Motions in Video

Video magnification is a computational procedure to reveal subtle variations during video frames that are invisible to the naked eye. A new spatio-temporal method which makes use of connectivity based mapping of the wavelet sub-bands is introduced here for exaggerating of small motions during video frames. In this method, firstly the wavelet transformed frames are mapped to connectivity space a...

متن کامل

Evaluating the status of agricultural articles of Iranian researchers at the Scopus citation database based on the Hirsch index

Background and aim: Today, the use of scientometric methods to evaluate the scientific outputs of researchers in various fields has been highly regarded and the Hirsch index (h-index) is one of the most important scientometric indices due to the simultaneous measurement of quantity and quality of scientific outputs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the status of Iranian agricult...

متن کامل

Performance and Scientific collaboration of Iran Occupational Health Journal: A scientometric analysis

Background: Of common scientometric indices is evaluating the performance and scientific collaboration of journals and organizations. Iran Occupational Health Journal belongs to Iran University of Medical Sciences and committed to providing scientific evidence for improving occupational health. Based on the importance of health at work, this study aimed to evaluate the Journal’s performance and...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998